Did US Execute Japanese Soldiers for Waterboarding American POWs?

By -
I am reluctant to take anything from the Huffington Post at face value, but unless Begala is making all this up, it seems the "quit your liberal bellyachin'" pro-waterboarding hawks are in an awkward position. Apparently US judges hanged Japanese soldiers for waterboarding American POWs during World War II. But then again, it's not really torture if you're doing it to spread your system of government all over the world, as opposed to imposing your form of government all over the world.

Comments

  1. John Goes10:05 PM

    Bob, you just don't GET it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous4:58 AM

    A logical argument seeing as how America started World War II... oh, wait.


    Moron.

    ReplyDelete
  3. gcallah8:54 AM

    So, the definition of 'torture' is different depending on who started World War II?!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bob Murphy9:41 AM

    Let's be fair Gene... Anon might think the definition is the same, but that it's OK to torture if you didn't start the conflict.

    ReplyDelete
  5. James Rothfeld9:55 AM

    Gene:

    We Good. They Bad.

    How difficult can that be?

    ReplyDelete
  6. JOR10:30 AM

    Don't tell me you're taking the side of those liberal US judges against the heroic Jacku Bowura!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kevin Carson10:20 PM

    If Obama keeps on with this horseshit about "moving on" and "not politicizing things," he needs to go to Nuremberg and apologize to all the Nazis who were executed for "just following orders."

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more