The Origin of Those Silly Quotes?

By -
We all have heard thew numerous complaints about people using quotation marks for emphasis. But I was just struck by a plausible notion of how this started. I was looking at a sign that included some trade-marked phrase, e.g., try new Tried Detergent with miracle "super-whitening doodads". I occurred to me that people could have seen this use, and, not understanding the quotes indicated a trade-marked phrase, have thought that they were there for emphasis.

Any thoughts?

Comments

  1. Silas Barta10:59 AM

    I don't have an answer for your question, but your explanation seems plausible. I see a parallel to e.g. the claim that "It costs an arm and a leg" originated from artists charging more for portaits that included an arm and a leg. Most people wouldn't have understood the reference to portaits because those are expensive, and the idiom picked up because people understood it as "It costs you something valuable" because an arm and a leg are the last things you'd give up.

    Incidentally, did you have in mind sites like these, that make fun of signs that use unnecessary quotation marks? I've found the site really funny because of what happens when you read the quotation marks as scare quotes. E.g., "Try our new 'bacon' wraps!" = "Um, it's not really bacon"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Andy Stedman3:57 PM

    I've seen that site before, Silas. It "literally" had me rolling on the floor laughing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. gcallah10:56 AM

    Welcome back, Silas!

    I didn't have any site in mind, just the shop signs I see every day.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more