When the Machines Take Over

By -
I eject a CD from the player in my car. Then I spend a little time searching for the one I really want to put in. But, if I spend just a second too long... I lose! The player sucks the CD back in.

What the fark? I deliberately ejected the thing. What the heck should it matter how long I want to leave it sitting half in the drive? But I guess my CD player knows better than me: if I leave t he CD sitting there for twenty seconds, I must really want to hear it again, after all!

Comments

  1. Bob Murphy11:10 PM

    I think it's vulnerable to leave a CD hanging out halfway, though? Like it assumes you must have forgotten about it, and then if your 3-year-old stumbles on it, it will snap in half. I'm being serious.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah9:59 AM

      That's a fine point at home, but I rarely let 3-year-olds run around in the front seat of my car.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous6:04 PM

    I understand what you mean, and I actually wish that they would extend the time. However, the best place for a CD is either in a case or in the tray of the CD player. If left in the eject slot, then there can be damage caused to the CD by the vibrations caused during driving, as well as undue wear and tear upon the parts and mechanisms involved in safely receiving and ejecting disks.

    My advice to you is to get an iPod (or equivalent) if you have an auxiliary jack, or if no AUX jack, then pull out the CD after you hit eject (after all, why would you hit eject if you didn't actually intend to remove the disk?).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more