Why Do People on TV Sleep Like That?

By -
With their heads propped up at a forty-five degree angle by their pillows? I have never seen anyone sleep like that in real life. Any of you?

I suspect it is to get a better camera angle on the actors face.

Comments

  1. Daniel2:29 PM

    Kate does, or pretty close. I don't understand it either.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous3:08 PM

    I often only use a portion of the pillow or just my arm (or a combination of the two). Sometimes I will use the whole pillow depending upon my inclinations. The only time I elevate my head is when I am reading in bed.

    I do know that many actors don't feel that dialogue or background is as important as control over facial movements, head angles, body language, and composure. Overall, most focus is put onto the upper regions of the body, most notably the face/head and shoulders. Of course, I am talking of screen actors; stage actors have a whole different approach to acting due to the nature of the medium (but it includes some aspects of the screen-actor's toolkit).

    The film industry is pretty face-centric, all the way from agencies, to casting, to acting technique, to framing of shots, to marketing, etc. There are certainly exceptions, but like any art there is a tendency toward certain formulas. Overall, I think that your simple conclusion is correct, they are attempting to get a better shot of the actor's face.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8:36 AM

    I've also wondered why women on TV/movies often gather up the bedsheet and hold it over their breasts before getting up to walk around, or even just in order to sit up in bed. I guess TV/movie people are just different. ;-)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more