The strange life of the modern "scholar"

By -
I just spent a couple of days assembling a grant application. Ugh, what a bore. And how little it had to do with being a scholar! There would almost seem to be a negative correlation between people who are good at grant applications, and people who are good scholars: A good scholar must almost necessarily consider the hours spent on the application a waste of time that could've been used for scholarship.

I bet Aquinas never had to deal with grant applications.

Comments

  1. Silas Barta5:30 PM

    Isn't that like saying:

    - I could build much better widgets if I didn't have to spend time convincing retailers and customers of the superiority of my widgets, since time spent convincing is not time spent refining my process.

    - Workers could be in better worker/job-position matches if they didn't have to waste time convincing employers of the optimality of that match.

    - Defense contractors could build much better weapons platforms if they didn't have to lobby for the funding, since time spent lobbying Congress is not time spent doing wind-tunnel tests.

    What system are you comparing to? What would be within-the-system improvement?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah7:35 PM

      Interesting point, Silas. Overall, I think the "get a wealthy patron once and for all" system was somewhat better. But you are right: somehow, scholars need funding.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more