Olive Garden is grotesque

By -
Who is tempted to eat multiple bowls of really bad pasta simply because you can pig out for only $9.99? Why wouldn't someone go instead to a local restaurant where they can get one bowl of nice pasta for $9.99, and not be motivated to ridiculously overeat?

Comments

  1. Ken B11:24 PM

    I always get the soup and salad combo, which is both tasty and reasonably priced. I haven't ordered pasta there since about 2001.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thomas L. Knapp8:02 AM

    Well, Gene, if I'm not mistaken you've spent some time in Italy where they think of food differently than most Americans do. Beverages, too -- I understand that they drink their espresso from the little cups there instead of ordering 32 ounces of sugary liquid with two or three "shots" of espresso in it.

    So most Americans probably have a different mindset as to what constitutes "overeating" and as to what constitutes "good" or "bad" pasta (I'm certainly no expert on pasta myself; used to love it, now I usually avoid it).

    I've tried "authentic" Italian pizza and I guess it's OK, but I prefer a good New York style slice or a big goopy glop of Chicago style. I don't kid myself that those things are really "pizza" in the Italian sense, but that doesn't make them "bad."

    ReplyDelete
  3. gcallah11:58 AM

    I like plenty of Italian-American food. Just not Olive Garden.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more