The cancer of American politics

By -
"For example, Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act in 2010 turned into something of a monstrosity during the legislative process as a result of all the concessions inside payments that had to be made to interest groups, including doctors, insurance companies, and the pharmaceutical industry. The bill itself ran to 900 pages…" -- Francis Fukuyama, Political Order and Political Decay, p. 480

Yes, indeed: the good done by the ACA could have been done with a 10-page bill subsidizing insurance coverage for everyone making under some amount per year. That means there are 890 pages of bad in there.

Comments

  1. Samson Corwell5:42 PM

    What do you the most pressing issue in national politics is today?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah6:57 PM

      Breaking the hold of the military-industrial complex on our politics.

      Delete
    2. Ken B7:37 PM

      That most people see ad hominem as sound.

      Delete
    3. Samson Corwell9:20 PM

      Would that happen to include the security state?

      Delete
  2. Keshav Srinivasan5:58 PM

    So you don't think the insurance regulations did any good?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah6:56 PM

      I'm sure they did somebody some good, but enough good to be worth the huge complexity of the bill? I doubt it. Companies apparently have to hire ACA consultants to understand how to deal with it!

      Delete
    2. Samson Corwell9:21 PM

      "Companies apparently have to hire ACA consultants to understand how to deal with it!"

      But that's job creation right there!

      Delete
  3. Ken B7:37 PM

    Indeed. A mandate makes a lot of sense, but you have to be willing to pay for it. End the employer exemption, give everyone X via a negative tax, and supply federally paid catastrophic insurance.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more