Git documentation

By -
Current, in a comment, shared this wonderful parody of git documentation. The unfortunate thing is that the actual git documentation is only a tiny, tiny bit more comprehensible then this spoof.

Also, from this and other comments arises a question: is every single regulat reader of this blog except for Bob Murphy a programmer?

Comments

  1. Keshav Srinivasan4:25 PM

    I'm not a programmer (although I took Java in high school). I'm a graduate physics student.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah5:01 PM

      I knew it wasn't literally everyone. But i have been surprised by the programmers coming out of the woodwork since i've been posting programming material

      Delete
  2. Samson Corwell6:57 PM

    I'm not a programmer and like Keshav my major is physics, but I'm a techie and written small programs, patched Linux, and am currently writing a loadable kernel module.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Current4:24 PM

    I'm an Electronic Engineer, I do some programming. I occasionally use Subversion. I was thinking of switching to Git, I started reading the docs and they made me want to detach Linus Torvald's head.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Matt5:05 PM

    I am. Mostly "big data machine learning" type stuff (buzzword alert) but I've done some graphics and simulation work in the past.

    My colleagues all got a kick out of the parody.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more