It's Good We Have Editors, Right?

By -
The Washington Post thinks Corinthians is in "the Hebrew Bible":

"[Curry] wears a tattooed ‘A’ on one finger, and a Hebrew Bible verse inside of one wrist: 'Love never fails,' First Corinthians, 13:8."

Given the contempt in which most editors at WP probably hold traditional religions, I'm thinking the writer might have been able to claim that Corinthians is in the "Hindu Bible" and get away with it.

Comments

  1. Unknown6:25 AM

    Curry's tattoo is written in Hebrew

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah10:08 AM

      So I've learned... which is strange, as Corinthians was written in Greek! But in any case, "the Hebrew Bible" means the Old Testament.

      Delete
    2. Unknown4:51 PM

      Curry has a tattoo in a language he can't read, I'm sure it's all Greek to him. As for writing "Hebrew Bible", this must be one of them word hacks ;)

      Delete
  2. Thomas L. Knapp9:48 AM

    Are you sure the writer wasn't just doing a poor job of conveying the meaning "a Bible verse written in Hebrew?"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah10:07 AM

      Apparently they were. But "Hebrew Bible" has a standard meaning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_Bible

      Delete
  3. rob9:57 AM

    Don't they mean a "Bible verse written in Hebrew" ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah10:07 AM

      Apparently that is what they mean. A principle of good writing: write what you mean!

      Delete
  4. Samson Corwell2:55 AM

    "Given the contempt in which most editors at WP probably hold traditional religions…"

    Are they a liberal or a conservative rag? I've never paid much attention to the ideological leanings of newspapers.

    And I'm assuming there are modern religions they don't hold in contempt.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more