Conundrum

By -
So, it's 3:46am and I'm still in the LSE library -- and no Ritalin! Now the question is, should I go home now, or just wait out morning? I think I'll go fetch that biography of Newton from the stacks.

Follow up: I wound up waiting for the tube to start running at 5:50, and I arrived home about 7.

Comments

  1. Anonymous3:22 PM

    Do you mark a cubicle for yourself yet? Maybe you can bring in a throw rug, a hearty houseplant, a small espresso maker, and some photos of the kitty?

    Did LSE insitute this 24hr policy just for finals term or will this be the case going forward? If it's the latter, I imagine they will have the squatter problem.

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah5:16 PM

    I have not as of yet staked out my own cubicle. The 24-hour opening is just for summer term.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more