Clever Couple

By -
My wife and I independently came up with the idea of calling our outings with our son "random walks." I.e. Clark will go in one direction for a few steps, then for no apparent reason will make a sharp turn and go a different way. When he's older I'll take him on a martingale jog. (Okay you got me, I'm bluffing. I don't know the difference between a random walk and a martingale.)

Comments

  1. Tim Swanson12:40 AM

    Speaking of walking and what not, you might enjoy this old sketch from Monty Python: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ministry_of_Silly_Walks

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous9:16 PM

    they are good Pirates of the Burning Sea Gold
    potbs gold

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more