V for...

By -
I was with some academic friends Monday. One of them was praising V for Vendetta, which he had just seen over the weekend. He remarked, "Some of the lines in the movie could have come out of the mouth of Ayn Rand."

I asked, "So some character said, 'Nathaniel, Frank's not home -- quick, bend me over the back of that couch!'"

Feel free to add your own line in the comments.

Comments

  1. Anonymous1:47 PM

    "Murray Rothbard is ostracized!"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wally Conger9:46 PM

    "Evey, check your premises!"

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sheldon Richman12:47 PM

    Naughty! That's my comment to you! :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous9:43 AM

    V is V

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous1:08 AM

    "V is V"

    Excellent!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous10:17 PM

    it makes me excited rose online zuly
    sro gold

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more