First let's kill all the lawyers...

By -
On an email discussion group, libertarian bad boy Stephan Kinsella relayed a college moment that was quite instructive. He was in an econ class and they were learning about the Phillips Curve. He asked, "If all of the unemployed people died overnight, would that cause inflation?" He said that the teacher stuttered something about the curve shifting.

Comments

  1. Anonymous3:32 AM

    The Phillips curve is out of favor as a longrun model, right? My understanding, and I'm only beginning to get into more advanced micro, is that the Phillips model is only somewhat true in the shorterm, but that few see any long term correlation between inflation and unemployment.

    Tangentially, there was an opinion piece in the WSJ today by Robert D. McTeer that notes "The Phillip Curve is rarely mentioned anymore, but it pervades the common view that inflation can be tamed only through a weaker economy".

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous3:32 AM

    The Phillips curve is out of favor as a longrun model, right? My understanding, and I'm only beginning to get into more advanced micro, is that the Phillips model is only somewhat true in the shorterm, but that few see any long term correlation between inflation and unemployment.

    Tangentially, there was an opinion piece in the WSJ today by Robert D. McTeer that notes "The Phillip Curve is rarely mentioned anymore, but it pervades the common view that inflation can be tamed only through a weaker economy".

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wabulon6:38 PM

    And what I want to know is: Which John G is responsible for which comment?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3:41 PM

    Nice design of blog.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous1:45 PM

    Thanks for article!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous12:28 AM

    Thanks for interesting article.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous7:41 AM

    Glad to read articles like this. Thanks to author!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous7:18 PM

    Great Article! Thank You!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous6:39 AM

    Thanks to author! I like articles like this, very interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous8:24 AM

    Very interesting!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous4:00 PM

    nice blog!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous7:16 PM

    nice blog!Nice information

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous7:20 AM

    :-) ochen\' zaebatyj blog!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous4:45 AM

    Very interesting article, I have long sought. It is in front of me. I agree with you!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous6:25 AM

    Very interesting article, I have long sought. It is in front of me. I agree with you!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous7:17 AM

    soglasen s vami ochen\' zaebatyj blog!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous12:25 PM

    Excellent website. Good work. Very useful. I will bookmark!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous6:02 PM

    Keep up the great work. It very impressive. Enjoyed the visit!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous7:04 AM

    Hello! Interesting article, thanks to author!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous2:08 AM

    when you havehero gold,you can get more
    hero online gold,you can brush
    hero online money,and then you will get
    hero money,you can
    buy hero goldfor others.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In ancapistan, if you have no property, you have no rights

By -
Ancaps often declare, "All rights are property rights." I was thinking about this the other day, in the context of running into libertarians online who insisted that libertarianism supports "the freedom of movement," and realized that this principle actually entails that people without property have no rights at all, let alone any right to "freedom of movement." Of course, immediately, any ancap readers still left here are going to say, "Wait a second! Everyone owns his own body! And so everyone at least has the right to not have his body interfered with." Well, that is true... except that in ancapistan, one has no right to any place to put that body, except if one owns property, or has the permission of at least one property owner to place that body on her land. So, if one is landless and penniless, one had sure better hope that there are kindly disposed property owners aligned in a corridor from wherever one happens to be to wherever the...
Read more

St. Paul and I Agree...

By -
Taxation is not theft: "Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves." -- Romans 13 The key idea implicit here, and the one that turned me on the subject of whether or not taxation is theft, is that "every soul" owes obedience to the "governing authorities." Now, if that is a debt I truly owe , then, when those authorities levy the taxes they need to do the job of governing, I owe them those taxes, and attempts to collect them certainly do not constitute acts of theft. And obviously it doesn't matter at all, from this point of view, whether or not I "signed" any sort of "social contract." (In fact, the history of political thought since the Reformation can be read as an attempt to find a secular rep...
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Read more