Strange Sign at Arcade

By -
I took my son to the mall to let him run around the coin operated "vehicles" (rocket ship, race car, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle ride, etc.). One of them had a warning label that said:

DO NOT LEAVE CHILD UNATTENDED
ONE CHILD PER RIDE
MAXIMUM WEIGHT 50 KGs OR 100 LBS


Is anyone else questioning the universe because of that last line?

Comments

  1. Anonymous9:37 AM

    Because the conversion is off by 10% due to an affinity for round numbers, or because kg is a measure of mass, not weight? In any case, the universe seems fine here.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bob Murphy11:04 AM

    I'm talking about the rounding. So what is the rule? Can heavier European kids ride it than Americans? Or does the customer get to decide? Or does the management get to decide? E.g. your kid weighs 101 pounds and he is violating the rule, because the rule really is "100 lbs," and so saying the rule is "50 kg or 100 lbs" is still a true statement.

    ReplyDelete
  3. gcallah12:38 PM

    I was thinking they had found a new universal constant: The maximum possible weight is 100 pounds. (Another problem with the sign is that kilograms are not a measure of weight!)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more