Digging Through the Photo Archives...

By -
I liked these (click for a larger image):


Sunset at Valentino Pier in Brooklyn.


High noon at Park Place in Cardiff.


A distinguished looking fellow in Cardiff gets shit-faced.


Camilla Boisen hard at work in the research students' room at the Cardiff U. School of European Studies.


Boerum Hill and Park Slope in Brooklyn at sunset.

Comments

  1. Anonymous6:11 PM

    Nice pics, but bad links, Gene. You have an extra "gene-callahan" in each of them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah8:35 AM

    I don't understand, Andy -- they all look fine to me, and work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. John Goes11:42 AM

    They don't work for me, either. If you click on the image there is an extra gene-callahan in the tag.

    ReplyDelete
  4. gcallah11:57 AM

    It was actually a missing '/' -- I guess Safari corrects for that automatically, while browser X doesn't. Let me know if it works now.

    ReplyDelete
  5. John Goes4:28 PM

    Works. Great pictures, Gene. What bottle is that fellow carrying?

    ReplyDelete
  6. gcallah1:24 PM

    I can't remember, and I can't quite read it in the photo. What's wonderful is how aptly the sculptor placed his subject's hand for accepting a prankster's gift.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more