I Assert, You Decide

By -
I had a quick spot on Fox Business on Wednesday. Go to this link and scroll down to find it.

(BTW, it's surprisingly difficult to know when the camera is first on you, and it's hard to maintain a big smile beforehand, with people all around the studio. So that's why I have the charisma of Al Gore in the beginning.)

Comments

  1. Anonymous12:09 AM

    Good job. I especially liked how you explained the way an increased future supply would lower the current price. When Keith Olbermann interviewed Paul Krugman last night about McCain's energy plan he implied that offshore drilling would do nothing to help the current situation because it would be years before the oil would be extracted. Krugman didn't correct him.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bob Murphy12:22 AM

    It's funny but a lot of economists don't get this point. I didn't realize it myself until I came across an unpublished paper written by two economists from a few years ago on the impact of ANWR. (I'll see if I can get an online version of their paper...)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous1:22 AM

    Nice job.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3:07 AM

    "I especially liked how you explained the way an increased future supply would lower the current price."

    I thought this was exceptional in its insight.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bob Murphy10:13 AM

    Aww gee guys, I'm blushing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more