The Perfect Storm

By -
I just endured a preview of Rob Schneider in The Hot Chick. I'm amazed that the combined density of the lead actor's stupidity with that of the script did not suck everyone who worked on the movie through a black hole and into another universe.

Comments

  1. Anonymous9:42 PM

    Dear Gene,

    Speaking only for myself, but as someone who appreciates your humanity, please, please, do what you can in the future to avoid exposure to such corrosive drivel. Even a preview might permanently warp your brain.

    Can I send you anything? Sympathy card, teddy bear, interweb hugs? It must be awful what you're going through.

    Try, try to forget.

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah10:13 PM

    I'm afraid that the exposure to the stupidity singularity of even this preview has unalterably corrupted my being.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bob Murphy10:54 PM

    I actually paid $9.50 to watch the Zohan movie a few days ago. At this point my favorite part of movies are the previews. You would think that I would learn to stop getting excited about previews to things that I don't like as much as the next set of previews.

    ReplyDelete
  4. gcallah3:57 AM

    No, Bob, given your enthusiasm for the "Ron Paul preview," we wouldn't think that at all.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more