I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
If they test a new drug for every bizarre side effect known to man, the drug is bound to get tagged with some of em. If on the other hand they had a reasonable suspicion that led to testing for gambling urge enhancement, now that's spooky. Almost worth looking up the literature.
ReplyDeleteBut isn't it just weird that something that could calm your twitchy leg could also spur you on to gamble recklessly, predicted or not?
ReplyDeleteMy grandparents have known this for some time. They have friends on high blood pressure medication who go to casinos and always end up losing their shirt. Before they were on the medication, Vegas was dull and uninteresting to them.
ReplyDeleteI suspect it is the same effect.
Weird.
ReplyDeleteThe page is so wonderful that I want to write something about myself.
ReplyDeleteI am so glad to receive some wow gold and the World of Warcraft Gold is the gift as my birthday. Some of the warcraft gold is very attractive for me that I will buy wow gold to enter into the game because the cheap wow gold is the key to the net game.