News from England

By -
A friend of mine with whom I hung out when I lived in Stoke-Newington just wrote me about the rioting. Now, Howie is a long-time resident of Stokey, who lived in squats for much of the eighties when he was playing in punk bands -- in other words, this isn't a rich aristocratic looking down his nose at the masses from his mansion:

"Stokey's ok I think. Hackney Central copped it a bit. I'm so ashamed of how my country looks. Buildings that escaped the Blitz have been burned down by these little shits. This ain't about poverty. It's opportunistic greed. Poor people don't steal Nike's. They make them for a buck a day. It ain't about politics. The Brigado Rossi didn't clean out the corner newsagent. These fucks ain't never, and will never work, they claim the dole and the rent, and hold their hands out for more. Then they do this to their own communities. Shopkeepers are getting tooled up now and defending their patch."

Comments

  1. Silas Barta2:41 PM

    Now, Howie is a long-time resident of Stokey, who lived in squats for much of the eighties when he was playing in punk bands -- in other words, this isn't a rich aristocratic looking down his nose at the masses from his mansion

    Wow, those are some good qualifications to refute a charge of elitism! I'm sure no one ever suffers a sharp rightward shift in worldview a quarter century after their youth.

    What _is_ your friend's homeownership position, by the way?

    (This isn't to defend the rioters or disagree with that quote; I just thought that was a strange way to cast him as an authority on this.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah2:44 PM

    I'm not saying he was an "authority," your doltedness. I'm just giving his background.

    "What _is_ your friend's homeownership position, by the way?"

    It's really none of your business, but last time I stayed with him he was renting a very small flat that did not even have its own toilet (there was a shared toilet in the hallway).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pedro9:42 AM

    Daniel Hannan is more or less of the same opinion as your friend:

    "(...) a surprising number of people will break the law if they can be reasonably certain of getting away with it. (...) The trigger was not a power cut or an earthquake, but the television images of police in Tottenham standing by while shops were plundered. (...) What we saw, in other words, was not some howl of protest against the system "

    Here's the link:

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100100793/ed-miliband-wants-an-inquiry-into-the-causes-of-the-riots-let-me-save-him-the-trouble/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more