I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Sad. Because Relighting an extinguished butt tastes horrible.
ReplyDeleteAs a former smoker (hanging around outdoor ashtrays) you see this often enough in central cities.
When I was in high school, I knew a kid who would occasionally assemble a full cigarette out of several butts and scotch tape.
I wonder if there are those who will only smoke used "American Spirit" Brand cigarettes. God those people are insufferable.
"Sad. Because Relighting an extinguished butt tastes horrible."
ReplyDeleteYeah, if I had had a smoke I would have given it to him.