Netflix recommendations are kind of weird

By -
Because I watched The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, I might also want to watch a documentary on Hannah Arendt?!

There is also a strange lack of "self-awareness" on the part of the recommendation software: one of the "top picks" for me is the show Luther. But I have already seen every episode.

Then, just two lines down the screen, a new set of selections is offered "Because you watched Luther." So here the software knows I watched Luther? Why didn't it know this just a moment before?

Comments

  1. Ken B9:24 AM

    It's to throw you off, so you'll think software is fallible, glitchy, and sometimes clueless. That way you won't recognize how the NSA secretly controls everything you do. It's the same with Siri.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more