I decided to move some discussion from this post up to the top level here. Specifically, Watoosh wrote: "Well, if violence is defined as initiation of force (which, of course, presupposes certain property rights), then I think Rockwell is correct..." Well, if we define cats as elephants, then many people keep elephants in their house. More seriously, firstly, violence is not usually defined that way. It's defined as, you know, violence, so that, say, someone may respond violently or non-violently to someone who aggresses against them. Otherwise, it would make no sense to say, for instance, "He punched me, but I did not stoop to violence in response." And, secondly, the libertarian usage of "initiation of force" is very offbeat. If I wander onto someone's meadow, most people would not say I had "initiated force" -- I mean, sure, I used "force" against the earth to push off walking, but that's not force directed against...
One classic Unix intro is actually titled The Unix Programming Environment.
ReplyDelete(With such gems as -- from memory -- "you may find it useful to employ software version control", "some newer, more advanced editors such as vim or emacs", and "enormous files, 30 kb in size".)
I read it when you were knee-high to a grasshopper, Silas.
DeleteCool! It's crazy that it's still in use -- the CTO bought it for me to read at my first software job (2012) at a hip startup.
DeleteAlso VMS. Crazy how many tools in the OS are helpful for coding.
ReplyDelete