I decided to move some discussion from this post up to the top level here. Specifically, Watoosh wrote: "Well, if violence is defined as initiation of force (which, of course, presupposes certain property rights), then I think Rockwell is correct..." Well, if we define cats as elephants, then many people keep elephants in their house. More seriously, firstly, violence is not usually defined that way. It's defined as, you know, violence, so that, say, someone may respond violently or non-violently to someone who aggresses against them. Otherwise, it would make no sense to say, for instance, "He punched me, but I did not stoop to violence in response." And, secondly, the libertarian usage of "initiation of force" is very offbeat. If I wander onto someone's meadow, most people would not say I had "initiated force" -- I mean, sure, I used "force" against the earth to push off walking, but that's not force directed against...
Trees have experience -- the tree knew it fell.
ReplyDeleteYes, the town will be alerting you to the fact if you don't clean it up. Your proof will be the fine they impose on you.
ReplyDeletePepe,
ReplyDeleteIt's pretty secluded. I think one of my neighbors would have to tattle on us.
Like Putin, I understand that leaving the tree back there indefinitely could upset the strategic balance of the neighborhood.