I decided to move some discussion from this post up to the top level here. Specifically, Watoosh wrote: "Well, if violence is defined as initiation of force (which, of course, presupposes certain property rights), then I think Rockwell is correct..." Well, if we define cats as elephants, then many people keep elephants in their house. More seriously, firstly, violence is not usually defined that way. It's defined as, you know, violence, so that, say, someone may respond violently or non-violently to someone who aggresses against them. Otherwise, it would make no sense to say, for instance, "He punched me, but I did not stoop to violence in response." And, secondly, the libertarian usage of "initiation of force" is very offbeat. If I wander onto someone's meadow, most people would not say I had "initiated force" -- I mean, sure, I used "force" against the earth to push off walking, but that's not force directed against...
I’m only visiting to say that I really enjoyed seeing this post, it is really clear and well written. Are you going to post more about this? air jordanIt appears like there is more material here for more posts
ReplyDeleteThat's the most flattering comment spam I've seen yet. Pointless and empty, but still flattering.
ReplyDeleteAndy, I'm just posting to say that I really enjoyed seeing your comment, it is really clear and well written. Are you going to post more about this?
ReplyDeleteOh, yes. Is it really okay that my second sentence has no verb? Can it still be a sentence?
ReplyDeleteAndy, I enjoy seeing your sentences without verbs because they are so clear and well written. Are you going to post more sentences without verbs?
ReplyDeleteAndy punked out, so I'll post a sentence with no verb. Shit! Or maybe that's a sentence with no noun. Oh, well.
ReplyDelete