Important Message from a Reader

By -
Just received this e-mail, coming from an unknown top-level domain:

Dear People of Earth,

We Plutonians are deeply offended by all this blabber about Pluto not really being a planet. Cut it out now, or suffer the consequences.

Sincerely yours,
People of Pluto

Comments

  1. Anonymous2:11 AM

    Well done!
    [url=http://intvcbxl.com/zmkp/xeys.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://laxenumw.com/olna/jptg.html]Cool site[/url]

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous2:11 AM

    Thank you!
    http://intvcbxl.com/zmkp/xeys.html | http://yhnpzgeq.com/lczz/vzbm.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous6:36 PM

    Hey
    good site

    please, if you know anywhere about UFO activity - contact me ufos2006@yahoo.com
    http://bestufo.org
    Good Luck

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more