Superman Needs an Agent

By -
One could make a career applying the socialist calculation argument to various topics...

Comments

  1. Jeffrey Tucker9:22 PM

    You saw that this landed on Digg.com?

    here is the thread.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bob Murphy12:10 PM

    Huh...I had tried using Google to see if anyone linked to it, and Google said no (unless I did it wrong). Does something have to be pretty popular for the "link:" feature in Google to pick it up?

    I wasn't bothered so much by the people who said, "Superman doesn't work for money!"; I have gotten used to people ignoring my handling of their objection in the original article.

    But what really insulted me was the guy questioning my claim that the Superman of the first four movies could teleport.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more