I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Did you know that you can embed videos in your blog? Copy the Embed link on the YouTube page and paste it into your blog. I think you need to be on the HTML editor rather than the rich text editor for it to work.
ReplyDeleteHoly schmokes! It works!
ReplyDeleteI alwasys want to have a lot of Asda Story gold and then i will give my friends some Asda Story money and i will also go to buy Asda Story Gold to get some cheap Asda Story gold, so i like it very much.
ReplyDelete