Countably Infinite

By -
Is there a way I (or Gene perhaps) can track how many people visit this blog? Keep in mind that I am very green regarding this stuff; I don't know the difference between a unique visit / page view / etc.

Also, is there a way I can cheat to make it seem more popular than it is?

Comments

  1. Anonymous3:59 PM

    Geez Bob,

    You would think a empirists like yourself would be tracking all this stuff and making all kinds of exponential projections into the future as to when you will surpass the New York Times in vistors.

    If you are cheap, though you might like it because it is complicated, Google analytics is free:

    http://www.google.com/analytics/

    The best out there is hitslink.com. It's around $20 per month but it tells you exactly who is coming to your site (including what governmant agencies are taking notice of what posts)

    You will also get to see who visits your site for Gene's inspiring (wink) and insightful comments about LRC and Ron Paul.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bob Murphy4:37 PM

    You will also get to see who visits your site for Gene's inspiring (wink) and insightful comments about LRC and Ron Paul.

    What do you mean? That the paid version allows one to isolate people who are coming in via specific posts, rather than going to Crash Landing first?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bob Murphy4:41 PM

    I tried several times to register at Google Analytics and it kept saying "Invalid input."

    I have stopped liking computers since around 1999.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous5:40 PM

    What do you mean? That the paid version allows one to isolate people who are coming in via specific posts, rather than going to Crash Landing first?

    Yup.

    The coolest vsit to my site came from eop.gov, "Executive Office of the President"

    ReplyDelete
  5. TokyoTom10:58 PM

    Bob, try asking Jeff Tucker at LvMI. He has learned all about this kind of stuff and has a couple of gurus working with him. If you need his address let me know.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous1:05 AM

    Hey Bob,

    Why don't you have Gene call Jeff Tucker for the tracking info.

    ReplyDelete
  7. gcallah1:37 PM

    I actually just corresponded with Jeff the other day in a perfectly cordial fashion.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous5:44 PM

    I actually just corresponded with Jeff the other day in a perfectly cordial fashion.

    Good,then ask him how to technologically improve your site, so that you get more visitors to your anti-Ron Paul rants.

    Put it this way:

    "Hey Jeff,

    "Thanks for your cordial email. I really think there is a larger audience out there for my anti-Ron Paul stuff, what tracking system would you recommend so I can see who is reading my stuff and how can reach them.

    "Thanks, much Jeff, there was no one as nice as you at L. Ron Hubbard."

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In ancapistan, if you have no property, you have no rights

By -
Ancaps often declare, "All rights are property rights." I was thinking about this the other day, in the context of running into libertarians online who insisted that libertarianism supports "the freedom of movement," and realized that this principle actually entails that people without property have no rights at all, let alone any right to "freedom of movement." Of course, immediately, any ancap readers still left here are going to say, "Wait a second! Everyone owns his own body! And so everyone at least has the right to not have his body interfered with." Well, that is true... except that in ancapistan, one has no right to any place to put that body, except if one owns property, or has the permission of at least one property owner to place that body on her land. So, if one is landless and penniless, one had sure better hope that there are kindly disposed property owners aligned in a corridor from wherever one happens to be to wherever the...
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Read more

Against their will / we were taxing against their will / we were young and we were strong and we were taxing against their will

By -
Never one to allow a mistake to go uncompounded by a glaring error, Bob Murphy digs in deeper . He claims that "Taking money from people against their will is not akin to getting on the treadmill; it is akin to killing people against their will." Bob has introduced a largely irrelevant criterion here with his "against their will." Let us start with killing. (No, no, not killing Bob : we still love him despite his obstinacy.) The justice of a killing does not depend at all on whether the "victim" wants to be killed. If I shoot someone who is attempting to set off a nuclear weapon in Times Square, the fact that I killed him "against his will" does not make my killing immoral. And if a friend who is in despair asks me to shoot him in the head, the fact that he wants me to kill him would not make my action moral. Similarly, in taking money from people, the crucial question is whether you are taking it justly or unjustly, not whether they wan...
Read more