I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Gene,
ReplyDeleteYou've already written one novel, right? So all you have to do is write a second, third, and forth one between now and July, and you'll be eligible.
Well, I need to really rush, because it's July, 2009.
ReplyDeleteApparently, they wanted to give an award to some guy who was going to give a talk at St. Francis, and he had just published his fourth book, so it was a good way to direct the award his way.
Like the "help wanted: engineer" ads that detail desired experience and education so precisely that -what do you know?! only one person in the world fits.
ReplyDeleteThey used to have a lot of those in the detroit papers. Back in the days of help wanted ads and automotive engineers.
Like the "help wanted: engineer" ads that detail desired experience and education so precisely that -what do you know?! only one person in the world fits.
ReplyDeleteThey used to have a lot of those in the detroit papers. Back in the days of help wanted ads and automotive engineers.
Argosy, I believe that profession still exists in Japan and Korea.
ReplyDelete