The Mysteries of Mobile Phone Reception

By -
Our house in Milford, PA, is in a ravine. So I understand why mobile phone reception is bad. But what I don't get is why it is so fluctuatingly bad. From second to second, without moving at all, I will go from three bars, to zero, back to three. Does anyone understand the physics of cellular reception well enough to explain what might cause this? Silas?

Comments

  1. Bob Murphy4:50 PM

    I'm pretty sure Silas has nothing to do with your phone reception.

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah4:46 AM

    Silas and his reductionist philosophy are totally at the bottom of this.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Silas Barta10:03 AM

    I don't really know enough about the particulars of these kinds of environments to make anything more than a poorly-educated guess.

    I will, however, subtly change the topic, and ask why you haven't said something about Stephan Kinsella's anti-IPism, since it would seem that, from your perspective, it represents the worst of the ideological excesses of libertarians. (I say this is related because enforcement of IP rights is extrememly similar to enforcement of rights in the EM spectrum, for reasons given here

    ReplyDelete
  4. gcallah12:04 PM

    Silas, I have not had time to reflect much on IP issues. If I did, I would guess your take on how I would perceive Kinsella's position is correct.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more