A Reader Request

By -
Antiahithopel asked if I could post some of the books I have found to be "most enlightening." OK, I'm going to give this a whirl, although it's a rather off-the-cuff effort, and I'm sure I've missed many items I shouldn't have:

After Virtue, Alasdair MacIntyre
Whose Justice, Which Rationality?, MacIntyre
The Sources of the Self, Charles Taylor
The Idea of History, R.G. Collingwood
The Idea of Nature, Collingwood
Experience and Its Modes, Michael Oakeshott
Rationalism in Politics, Oakeshott
On Human Conduct, Oakeshott
The New Science of Politics, Eric Voegelin
A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, George Berkeley
The Silmarillion, JRR Tolkein
The Name of the Rose, Umberto Eco
Cutting Through Spiritual Materialism, Chogyam Trungpa
Science and the Modern World, Alfred North Whitehead
Language and Myth, Ernst Cassirer
Personal Knowledge, Michael Polanyi
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas Kuhn
The Fatal Conceit, FA Hayek
Politics, Aristotle
The Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle
Philosophy in a New Key, Suzanne Langer
Finnegans Wake, James Joyce
The Tao Te Ching, Lao Tsu

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more