Spell Checker Gone Mad

By -
I was trying to write "towards" on my iPhone. It first suggested I meant to write "roasted," and then thought it must be "dowager" that I was after.

What the hey?

Comments

  1. Thomas L. Knapp10:41 AM

    Perhaps you have your spell checker set to American English ("toward") as opposed to British English ("towards")?

    Be that the case or not, I do admire the spell checker. That needless, extraneous "s" on "toward" and similar words bugs the fuck out of me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah10:48 AM

    Those "extra" s's were put in their by the State, Tom, to keep would-be revolutionaries worked up over trivialities.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thomas L. Knapp12:05 PM

    Did the state misspell "there" for you too? ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. gcallah12:09 PM

    No, that was courtesy of Apple.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thomas L. Knapp10:16 AM

    Well, I won't object to that any more then. The trufry market has spoken.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more