The Mother of Error

By -
"Another benefit that comes from the revelation to men of truths that exceed the reason is the curbing of presumption, which is the mother of error. For there are some who have such a presumptuous opinion of their own ability that they deem themselves able to measure the nature of everything; I mean to say that, in their estimation, everything is true that seems to them so, and everything is false that does not. So that the human mind, therefore, might be freed from this presumption and come to a humble inquiry after truth, it was necessary that some things should be proposed to man by God that would completely surpass his intellect." -- Aquinas, Contra Gentiles

Comments

  1. Watoosh3:36 PM

    Aquinas is partly correct. Partly, because he neglects to understand the biggest presumption of all: thinking that your beliefs and moral stances are correct because you have privileged access to the omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent creator of the Universe.

    If presumption is the mother of error, then gullibility is its guardian.

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah4:39 PM

    I know, how stupid of Aquinas. It is as though he thought that people who, say, live among trees and study trees would know more about trees than do people who live in the middle of the Arctic.

    What a dope!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Avram11:23 PM

    Well the fairer anology would be its as if someone sold Aquinas a photo of a tree but he had no way of knowing if it was actually a real tree or not (as he had never seen one before) and studied it really hard (it might be a rock), and therefore claimed he knew more about trees than someone without the mysterious photo.

    But in any case Aquinas doesn't seem to think he has any privileged access to the creator of the Universe in the original quote so Watoosh is just saying things for the sake of saying them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more