I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
What are you in PA for?
ReplyDeleteI kind of live here, especially in the summer.
ReplyDeleteAs you would be older at the time that you won than at the time when you were playing then the sign could be accurate even for the oldest Pennsylvanian.
DeleteOh, ok. I was just curious because I live in Ohio, but I often work in PA.
DeleteIf this is another math post, Gene, you are going to get destroyed at Wenzel's blog.
ReplyDeleteI'm probably six hours east of you! But if you get out this way, give a shout.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely. I might be working out that way beginning in the next month or so. I don't have the details yet, nor do I know if I am going to be on that job for sure, but it is highly likely.
DeleteGive a shout if you ever get near Cleveland, though I cannot imagine why on Earth anyone would want to get near Cleveland.