"However Unfortunate This Situation Is..."

By -
I heard Chase CEO Jamie Dimon saying on the radio, in reference to the two-billion-dollar-trading loss, "this company will do what it always does..."

I think he meant, "Pay me a ginormous bonus."

Comments

  1. Prateek7:07 AM

    To be fair, the board and employees of JP Morgan may be in favour of paying Jamie Dimon a large bonus.

    Why?

    Some months ago, on the rumours that Jamie Dimon may step down, the cost of capital for the entire JP Morgan climbed up an entire one-and-a-half percent point. This implies that debt service for JP Morgan would be several billion dollars costlier if Dimon leaves.

    It may not even be because Dimon personally outperforms all other CEOs of his sector, but because the shareholders, creditors,.etc feel very confident when they hear him speak. Superficial, maybe, but strong implications in terms of money.

    I mean, Professor Callahan, if losing some guy means paying billions more in interest or dividend to satisfy financiers of the company, won't it be reasonable to pay that man in tens of millions just to retain him?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more