What a Strange Band

By -
The lineup: John Fogerty of Creedence Clearwater Revival Jerry Garcia and Bob Weir of the Grateful Dead Steve Jordan of the SNL Band and the Blues Brothers, amongst others But then the topper is the bass player. See if you can tell who he is without peeking in the YouTube comments section:

Comments

  1. Anonymous5:38 PM

    I only watched the first two songs and you don't really get a good look at his face, but at a glance it appears to be either Victor Wooten or Randy Jackson.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah8:23 PM

      Nice work: Randy Jackson it is

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:21 PM

      Ha, I was actually leaning more toward Wooten due to the trebly tone of the bass, plus I know that the Flecktones have played with both the Grateful Dead and Fogerty.

      The doubts that crossed my mind were that the bassist seemed a bit darker than Victor, he was a bit fatter than Victor, he appeared to be playing with a pick, and that Victor would have been bored to tears playing those bass lines. With these doubts I had to come to an alternative, and considering the build of the bassist, there was really only one other name I could think of (most of the well-known black bassists that I'm aware of are far slimmer).

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more