Evil Mastermind / Completely Incompetent Moron

By -
Scott Adams has been saying that anti-Trumps will soon be swinging from "Trump is Hitler" to "Trump is incompetent."

He is behind the times. Last week I actually listened to two progressives alternate between saying how terrifying Trump is because he is an evil mastermind who is going to establish an authoritarian dictatorship in the US, and saying how laughable he is is because he is such a stupid, incompetent boob, literally between one sentence and the next. And the two views kept alternating for a good five minutes.

Comments

  1. Matt3:35 PM

    It's easy for them to have it both ways. If an action is competent and devious, it was due to Bannon's influence. If it's incompetent, it was Trump or some incompetent member of his cabinet.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lord10:15 PM

    Never seen Todd and the Book of Pure Evil? Missed a good one. It always came with stupidity.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thomas L. Knapp6:47 AM

    There does seem to be a degree to which authoritarianism and incompetence -- or else irrationality of program -- are linked.

    Regime does X (for example, imposes state socialism) to accomplish Y (for example, general prosperity).

    Y is not accomplished.

    Instead of concluding that X will not accomplish Y, regime sends the secret police out to arrest everyone who, by saying that X wouldn't accomplish Y, stopped X from accomplishing Y.

    Y is still not accomplished. Regimes sends the secret police out to arrest everyone who may have at some point been friendly with those who, by saying that X wouldn't accomplish Y, stopped X from accomplishing Y.

    And so on and so forth.

    If Trump gets his way on immigration and trade, we'll find out from his reaction to the consequent cratering of the American economy whether he's just an authoritarian and is capable of learning, or whether he's an authoritarian and an idiot too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unknown8:25 PM

    And if Knapp gets his way and yet another terrorist group gets into this country and blows up more of our skyscrapers, we'll find out if he's a merely a moron or an idiot, too!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thomas L. Knapp7:30 AM

      The next immigration law that prevents a terrorist attack will be the first immigration law that prevents a terrorist attack.

      Delete
    2. gcallah10:51 PM

      The fact is, Thomas, you have ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA how many terrorist attacks immigration laws have stopped, be it 0 or 20,000,000: because they didn't happen!

      How many thefts did laws against stealing prevent today? What a ridiculous question!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more