Is this really an appropriate chant?

By -
I want out into the plaza outside my office. There was a group of trainee emergency medical technicians jogging in formation around the plaza.  As they did so, they chanted in unison:

Who are we?
Future EMT
Get out the way
Else you'll D-I-E

Is it consistent with the job of an EMT to threaten people with death for blocking your jogging path?

Comments

  1. Lord6:41 PM

    Only you would consider this a threat rather than a warning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah11:34 AM

      Only you would consider an off-hand joke an apt opportunity to insult your host here.

      And by the way, a "warning" of some future action I will do to cause you harm IS a threat, numb-balls.

      Delete
  2. Ken B9:50 PM

    A good business model provides for future demand.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Greg Pandatshang2:03 PM

    Naturally, if they understood all the intricacies such as what you pointed out here, they would already be EMTs, not future EMTs. What do you think they spend all day teaching them in EMT school?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Samson Corwell2:58 AM

    I think it's hilarious.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more