What's My Line?

By -
Today's mystery guest was called, by Eric Voegelin, "the greatest philosopher of history of the modern West." Let's give him a warm round of applause:
Voegelin also said that "in the course of the last 200 years no thinker has arisen who" equals me as an analyst of the political myth. Among the people upon whom I have had a profound influence I can count Samuel Coleridge, Karl Marx, James Joyce, Benedetto Croce, and Marshall McLuhan, and yet I am relatively unknown, even among professional philosophers.

Who am I?


Comments

  1. Samson Corwell1:12 AM

    Hegel.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nathan Conroy1:24 AM

    Gibbon? (Totally random guess.)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Scott5:28 AM

    Hegel?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ken B12:14 PM

    Not Hegel unless Hegel's writing is more than 200 years old.

    I have no idea but two "scriptwriter" guesses: Jesus or Hobbes.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Scott12:43 PM

    Ok. Hegel must be wrong. Not dead long enough. Plus Samson also picked him.

    Weber is also not dead long enough. Hmmm... this is pretty hard.

    If I get a second guess -- Giambattista Vico.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah12:46 PM

      Scott wins the cigar!

      Delete
    2. Scott12:57 PM

      Yippee!!

      Delete
    3. Ken B2:22 PM

      "Plus Samson also picked him."

      That's simpler and more elegant than the date thing.

      Delete
    4. Samson Corwell4:51 PM

      "That's simpler and more elegant than the date thing."

      Oi!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more