Phony-Baloney Progressive Outrage

By -
The NBA has announced that it might deny the state of Texas the possibility of hosting future All-Star games if the democratically elected legislature of the state passes a bill stating that men should use the men's bathroom, and women should use the women's bathroom. Apparently, this is a "human rights violation."

This is the same NBA that goes out of its way to play several games a year in China, a country that regularly employs slave labor in its factories.

Comments

  1. Lord9:29 AM

    It isn't too surprising they might be as concerned with direction as much as position.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah5:27 PM

      Hey Lord, I've got one neighbor who is thinking of signing a contract with my company worth millions. He beats his wife regularly, but hey, he's done so for years! However, my other neighbor, who will have no impact on my finances no matter what, spoke a bit harshly to his wife last week, for the first time ever. Now HIM, I'm going to boycott! You see, I'm "more concerned with direction than position"!

      Delete
    2. gcallah5:28 PM

      Really, Lord, I swear, the contract has nothing to do with it.

      Oh, and the NBA just called: they want to know if you'd like to buy the Brooklyn Bridge from them.

      Delete
  2. Ken B10:48 PM

    I assume men can use either bathroom in China, without consequence.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more