(No) Pasaran I

By -
The problem as I received it:

A professor announces on the first day of class that he doesn’t believe in grades, but the deanery insists; therefore he guarantees every student equal chances of receiving A or B, the grades to be assigned at random. Anyone who is unhappy with this should not take the course for credit.

Doomsday—and the professor gets out his little black grade book. He is about to flip a coin for each student, giving A for heads and B for tails, when he thinks: I didn’t merely promise that each student had the same expectation as every other; I promised an equal chance of A or B. What if this coin—or any coin—is not absolutely fair? What to do?

See P. II for answers.

Comments

  1. Anonymous3:43 AM

    It doesn't matter what the distribution of grades is, the coin doesn't have to be fair; the only requirement in such a case is that the probabilities are the same for each flip.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wabulon3:54 PM

    Sorry, Anonymous, but no: the requirement is not merely that each student has the same expectation as every other, but, more strongly, that each student has an equal chance of A or B.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous9:21 AM

    Great article! Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3:05 PM

    Thanks for interesting article.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous5:13 AM

    Excellent website. Good work. Very useful. I will bookmark!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous3:26 AM

    we supply cheapest gaia gold for the player.
    gaia online gold
    cheap gaia gold
    buy gaia gold
    gaiaonline goldwe have professional worker help you.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more