I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Ha. That could probably used as good new name for a condom brand.
ReplyDeleteThen again, "filter" implies letting some stuff through, so it would probably be easier to market Novas in Spanish-speaking countries.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but "nova" means the same thing in Spanish as in English--only you get more of a feeling of "newness" in the Spanish.
ReplyDeletehttp://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova
"Novia," on the other hand, means "girlfriend"--"the new one." Now what does that tell you about Spanish speakers??
ReplyDeletei like it Buy Perfect World Gold
ReplyDeletepotbs Doubloon