Gregynog

By -
Just back from the 2007 British Idealism Conference at Gregynog. (No, it's not said 'greg-EE-nog', it's said 'greg-u-NUG'.) How was the conference? Ideal, of course!

Some photos courtesy of Chris Rolliston (I will shrink them to fit soon!):

I have dinner with Colin Tyler, James Connelly, and Chinatsu Kobayashi. The bloody Brits wouldn't give me one of their funny hats!


My dissertation advisor, David Boucher, chats with Stamatoula Panagakou. Colin told David, 'That's the ugliest jumper I've ever seen.' David replied, 'It's not ugly, it's festive'.


A view of the grounds.


Whoa! Did I just hawk up a sidewalk oyster or what?! Steve Buckel is clearly disgusted.

Comments

  1. Woody8:36 PM

    I got a text message recently on my cell phone, which was obviously a "wrong number."

    It read to the letter as follows: "Wuts Good this the girl that works with me likES U AND SHE A JUMP"

    I can't really tell if it's a jump or not from that picture.

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah9:25 PM

    A 'jumper' is a sweater.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Chris2:41 PM

    The bloody Brits wouldn't give me one of their funny hats!

    I know people say the blogosphere is a cesspit of half-truths and innuendo, but really! 'I don't have to pursue the intimations of this particular tradition because it's not my own' indeed! I fear Collingwood (cf. NL, 16.71-74) is becoming too much of an influence on your thinking! ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. gcallah2:44 PM

    Yeah, it's true -- they did give me a hat. It was just funnier to make the comment I did.

    And it was really some one-pound coins, not a sidewalk oyster, in my hand.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Woody6:05 PM

    It is a pretty ugly sweater. I'm surprised somebody thought there would be a market for such a design.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wabulon4:18 PM

    The blogosphere is a truthpit of half-cess, says I.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous4:45 PM

    Those aren't just "funny hats", Gene. They wouldn't give you one because you're not a royalist or are you?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous8:19 AM

    It appears that the danger of over-interpretation arises in almost every field of life. My first conference at Gregynog this year was wonderful. But after spending most of the year on the shores of the Adriatic (or even in it) I found Wales in December was bloody freezing! I even had to hold up my hands up towards David's sweater to try and warm up. Good to meet you Gene, with or without hat.

    ReplyDelete
  9. gcallah2:58 PM

    You too, Steve.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous1:53 AM

    when you haveAtlantica online Gold,you can get more
    Atlantica Gold,it is decide to
    buy Atlantica online Gold,you can brush
    cheap Atlantica online Gold,finally,you can gave
    Atlantica online money to others.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more