Ignorant American

By -
I was reading a WSJ story today and was stunned to learn that Afghanistan has a larger population than Iraq. (It's 31.9 million compared to Iraq's 27.5 million.)

Umm, does this shock anybody else? I guess I kinda pictured Afghanistan as a few dozen goatherds and opium growers. And Taliban.

Comments

  1. Woody5:53 PM

    I'm not shocked, but I think if I had been asked which country had the largest population, I would have guessed Iraq.

    I still think of Afghanistan as opium agrarian, but I think of Iraq as sandy, even though I know the south can be swampy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Woody5:54 PM

    yeah, yeah, yeah, I meant larger

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous3:14 AM

    Luck for me, I've known that for a long time. I also know that Iran's population is twice as large as Iraq's.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wabulon2:42 PM

    There's gotta be a habituating drug you can grow in sand, and IT'S UP TO US TO FIND IT FOR THEM!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous12:14 AM

    Welcome to our game world, Metin2 gold , Metin2 yang , Cheap metin2 yang , Cheap metin2 gold and Buy metin2 gold , they are very interesting.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more