Climate Activists Defend Property Rights...

By -
...by attacking a smokestack. I am curious what our libertarian friends who believe in manmade global warming think of this verdict. I am sure they will tell us.

Comments

  1. TokyoTom2:43 PM

    Some of my thoughts are noted here, if the mountain doesn`t mind paying me a visit. Maybe I`ll even get a reaction!

    It`s off-thread, but in light of the front page news on our latest scandal regarding oil & gas on public lands, you might care to revisit my post about cranking up pressure on politicians to cut American citizens directly in on all of the fithly lucre If politians, bureaucrats and Alaskans get to play with the roylaties, why can`t we? If we did get a cut, you can bet there`ll be citizens, prosecutors and lawyers all paying closer attention to how public resources are managed. Nothing like semi-privatization to alter incentives.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jim10:41 PM

    Bob, this may be the single silliest post you've ever written, and given that IIRC you're a creationist, that takes some doing.

    Why on earth do you imagine that I or people like me, who recognize the truth of AGW, are obligated to answer for either the action or the verdict? Because we aren't.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bob Murphy10:55 PM

    Jim,

    Sorry I was just referring to Silas and Tokyo Tom. I actually believe in manmade global warming, I just don't believe most of the recent global warming is manmade.

    Also, I wouldn't call myself a creationist, except in a sense that is equivalent to a theist.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wabulon3:21 PM

    God created global warming (unless you don't believe in global warming), so He wants the planet warmer, and we should all frgeddabahdit awready.

    ReplyDelete
  5. TokyoTom11:20 AM

    Hmmm. Apparently your curiosity was a rather idle one, Bob ....

    Wabulon, so having eaten of the fruit of the tree of knowledge, we have not inherited any responsibility for understanding or considering the consequences of our own actions? Great!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more