Profits are up!

By -
Did you know...

That Isaiah named one of his sons speedy-spoil quick-booty (suitably translated from the Hebrew, of course)?

That Jeremiah once bought real estate as a prophetic act?

UPDATE:
Oh, and Isaiah's son's name was an act of prophecy, as well.

And so was the name of the kid was father (a prophet -- I forget which one) who had married a hooker -- he named his kid, essentially, "Not mine"!

Comments

  1. John Goes6:21 AM

    Can you cite passages, Gene?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10:31 AM

    Anytime Mahershalalhashbaz is mentioned in a blog post, that's a good time.

    I told folks when my wife was pregnant that we were considering Bible names. "Oh, like Daniel or Jacob?" "No, we're thinking Mahershalalhashbaz."

    "Oh."

    Lee

    P.S. We went with Damaris, Amos, Phoebe, and Lucas.

    ReplyDelete
  3. gcallah8:01 PM

    John, the guy below you knows Isaiahs sons name in Hebrew -- you could Google that. I'll look for the Jeremiah passage.

    ReplyDelete
  4. gcallah9:06 PM

    Jeremiah chapter 32

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more