Great Example of the Bias Keeping Sean Hannity Up at Night

By -
In my friendly feud with Woody, he said that the media would be destroying Obama if he were as vulnerable as Palin. I disagree. I think "the mainstream media" is as pro-Obama as Fox News is anti-Obama. For a fantabulous example, click this link and look at these two Us magazine covers. The first discusses why Obama loves his wife. The second on Palin has the headline, "BABIES, LIES, AND SCANDAL." Now what's funny is, if you read the article, it turns out the "LIES" refer to false rumors circulating about Palin. Yet that's not the impression one gets from the cover.

Comments

  1. gcallah10:44 AM

    "he said that the media would be destroying Obama if he were as vulnerable as Palin. I disagree. I think "the mainstream media" is as pro-Obama as Fox News is anti-Obama."

    There's a problem with the reasoning here. Why can't it be that the mainstream media's favoritism towards Obama is based upon his not being as dumb as Palin, or at least in part based on it?

    I think that there is something to your idea Palin is being crafty, by the way -- although she's no rocket scientists, she is deliberately acting stupider than she really is, for the same reason that GWB, the scion of wealthy New England Patriarchs, educated at Eastern private schools and Yale, puts on a phoney hick accent when he speaks in public. They are maki9ng a deliberate appeal to the portion of the population too stupid to know that being called "Joe six pack" is an insult, the people who enthusiastically sing along to:

    I'm a redneck woman
    I ain't no high class broad
    I'm just a product of my raising
    I say, 'hey y'all' and 'yee-haw'
    And I keep my Christmas lights on
    On my front porch all year long
    And I know all the words to every Tanya Tucker song
    So here's to all my sisters out there keeping it country
    Let me get a big 'hell yeah' from the redneck girls like me, hell yeah

    ReplyDelete
  2. TokyoTom11:43 PM

    "Us" is the mainstream media?

    There's all kinds of bias our there, of course; the MSM was famously vicious to Gore, for example. But the MSM remain a part of the establishment and despite liberal leanings have been essentially toothless in standing up to Bush.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8:35 PM

    The page is so wonderful that I want to write something about myself.
    I am so happy to get some latale online gold and the latale gold is given by my close friend who tells me that the latale money is the basis to enter into the game. Therefore, I should buy latale online gold with the spare money and I have gained some cheap latale gold from other players.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more