Trying out blogwrite

By -

From my iphone. Here's emma:




Comments

  1. Anonymous4:40 PM

    Congratulations.iphoneblogwrite (maybe from now on I'll write only in URL-ese).

    Yeah, that pic is satisfactorily cute, but it doesn't adequately convey what a young beauty she is.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous7:48 PM

    Is she dating?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Unknown10:23 AM

    Gene,

    My daughter was born in 1998. Her mother & I decided we wanted to give her a beautiful yet rare name. We decided on Emma. Ten years later, we're drowning in little girls named Emma.

    Your daughter looks of a certain age that you may have had the same experience. Just curious.

    ReplyDelete
  4. gcallah12:07 PM

    Yep. We discovered, after naming her, that "Emma" was the second most popular name the year she was born ('99).

    ReplyDelete
  5. gcallah12:08 PM

    Oh, and Sydney, can you swim in the Gowanus canal? Can you do it wearing cement overshoes? Because this could be arranged.

    ReplyDelete
  6. TokyoTom6:30 AM

    Gene, you are blessed!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more