Lew Rockwell Interview With Naomi Wolf

By -
I am not exaggerating, this is quite possibly the best interview I have ever heard in my life. (Just click on the link and then play it from within your browser.) During the show itself, Naomi Wolf comes to see why libertarians are so opposed to the IRS and the Department of Education. She (at least twice) says, "Oh my God, you are so right." Hint: it's not because we hate poor people.

Comments

  1. Anonymous12:36 AM

    No kidding, that was fantastic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. australia-for-ron-paul2:33 AM

    My respect for Naomi Wolf has increased dramatically. It isn't just about "because she now agrees with me", but because she has the intelligence, integrity and humility to listen and reassess in the face of the psychological pain of recognising previous unexamined beliefs. That takes real guts, real heart, and it is a rare and precious thing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Stephan Kinsella10:43 PM

    bob, I told others the exact same thing. For serious, I think it might just be. The way Lew graciously handles her and manages to still treat her as the guest and worth hearing from, even after she makes her ignorance clear and peppers him with questions--openly, hungrily... it's really great. It gives me slight hope that there is hope--the left may be amenable, some of them. The right--not. Imagine a conservative being this receptive.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more