I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Stories like this make me wonder about 2012 being the end for us..ok really though wtf is wrong with people?
ReplyDeleteTo kill others as a suicide bomber seeking to strike a blow at the Great Satan is, I think, very wrong-headed, but at least I can comprehend that, if that's how you read the action, then the action makes sense. To kill someone to save $10 on a fake Christmas tree represents a far greater depravity.
ReplyDelete